Nikon has released a brand new camera body that’s a concept that many of us old film guys have been waiting for for a long time. I’ve just found an excellent Nikon Df review that confirms what I’ve been hoping this camera would be.
So the Nikon Df takes the body, ergonomics and design of the old 35 camera models and powers them with the same sensor found in the Nikon D4 (Nikon’s top of the line camera). The result is a camera that is made for serious professionals who need to be versatile. The idea is that Nikon has put assignable buttons and dials back on the camera. You can assign various functions to these buttons and dials that you need to get to often. This eliminates the need to dig through menu options on the rear LCD thus making it faster and easier to get the right shot.
For example, if you are shooting in difficult light and need to bracket your exposures, this can be assigned to a button right within a finger’s reach. If you need to adjust the ISO this can be done as well.
This is how we used to shoot back when 35mm cameras were still widely used in professional applications. It made it easy to concentrate on the photographs and not fiddling with the camera.
Anyway – excellent review – check it out for yourself.
I often get asked what the differences between DX and FX sensors are and how that weighs in when deciding to buy a camera. For some of you this is a very basic questions, but for the beginners out there this is very valid and should be a concern when you’re deciding what you want to be shooting on.
DX and FX are terms that Nikon uses. Canon simply refers to one sensor as “full frame” and the other as “APS-C”. In either case though this mainly refers to the physical size of the sensor. Full frame sensors (Nikon calls this FX) are the same size as the old 35mm film negative. Smaller size camera’s use a sensor that’s about 75% of this size. Then there’s micro 4/3 cameras. These sensors are basically half the size of a full frame.
So what does this all mean? Do you have to use a full frame sensor? Is the image quality better?
Well there are many factors that go into this as well as many myths. Size doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll have better or worse image quality. In the early days of digital cameras this may have had an impact, but today the technology is such that you’ll probably never notice a difference comparing images side by side.
The one possibility of advantage is low light. Larger sensors can space the pixels differently and thus they can cope with high ISO noise a bit differently. This is a slight advantage if you’re shooting in low light quite often.
You can learn more here – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image_sensor_format
One of the biggest things to do when starting out as a photographer is actually building a photography portfolio website. You need to find a way to get your work online so its important that you do that in a professional way that represents what it is that you do. It can be an overwhelming task – you have to get all of your work together you want to show then find a way to present it online. This can be a big task.
Many people think they need to learn HTML and how a web server works. I’ve even known people who decide to sign up for a class to learn how to do their website. This is a little bit extreme I think. There are tons of tools out there that will get you what you need to be up and running quickly. And you don’t have to know how to code.
These days most portfolios run off of a content management system (some people just call it a CMS for short). WordPress is one of the most popular out there. It was built for making a blog, but did you know it works really well for making a photography portfolio as well?
WordPress works by using what they call themes. Themes are a way of presenting your content – its the design and layout of your site. All you need to do is find the right theme for your photography portfolio and you are up and running!
I’ve found an excellent tutorial that will help you get up and running in less than 5 minutes! Check it out here:
There is certainly no question that photography is a tough and hard business to be in. Part of what I want to talk about on this blog is ways that you can be successful in the photography business despite the odds. Before we begin I want to make clear that there are two serious initiatives that you need to understand. First, you need to be good and second you need to be ready to work hard and be aggressive.
Now those two statements are probably painfully obvious and they are probably also pretty subjective and hard to figure out. What does it mean to be good? And what does it mean to work hard?
Photography is an art. It is a way of communicating visually and although those of us in the communication business understand this – often times the people who hire us do not. To many people, aesthetics are simply a want and not a need. Since the late 1990’s we’ve seen a weirder economy than we’ve ever seen. Often times its more down than up. When money is scarce, clients tend to cling to it more. When times get better they stay cautious. So its up to us as photographers to really do a better job at convincing potential clients that using us and using our work has value.
So obviously there is some sales involved but the other 2 ideas hold true. You have to be good and you have to work hard.
What does being good mean?
Good is defined as what you do best. Its also defined by who is willing to pay money for it. If you are good at what you photograph and you find someone this is worth something too you will be fine.
What does working hard mean?
The downside is the competition. You need to work really hard because there are probably 10 other people who do what you do and do it well. And they’re going after your market as well. Its the simple idea of competition. How hard do you need to work? Harder than these guys.
But don’t worry – reputation is recursive if you do it right. You can still make a living as a photographer. I do and I know many who do.